什么是 深度研究？

深度研究（Deep Research）技能是为 Openclaw Skills 设计的高级框架，使 AI 智能体能够从简单的搜索查询转向专业调查领域。它提供了一套系统化的方法，用于收集、分析和验证来自全网的信息，确保生成的见解基于多样化且权威的来源。

通过利用迭代方法，该技能允许智能体根据初步发现优化搜索参数，交叉引用冲突的主张，并评估各种信息渠道的可信度。对于在 Openclaw Skills 生态系统中需要准确性和深度至关重要的方案，它是生成高保真报告的理想解决方案。

下载入口:https://github.com/openclaw/skills/tree/main/skills/jiacode/deepresearchwork

安装与下载

1. ClawHub CLI

从源直接安装技能的最快方式。

2. 手动安装

将技能文件夹复制到以下位置之一

优先级：工作区 > 本地 > 内置

3. 提示词安装

将此提示词复制到 OpenClaw 即可自动安装。

深度研究 应用场景

• 学术研究，包括文献综述和严谨的来源验证。
• 商业智能，用于市场分析、竞争格局测绘和技术趋势跟踪。
• 高风险事实核查，以识别潜在的错误信息并评估来源的客观性。
• 需要对复杂技术或历史话题进行深度探索的综合性个人学习项目。

1. 主题分析：智能体定义研究范围，识别核心概念，并建立待回答的具体问题。
2. 广泛调查：利用网络搜索工具绘制全景图，识别主要利益相关者，并收集多样化的观点。
3. 详细提取：智能体从优先来源获取完整内容，提取特定数据点，同时保持清晰的归属标注。
4. 综合与验证：在多个来源之间交叉引用研究结果，以识别模式、解决矛盾并评估偏见。
5. 结构化报告：生命周期以生成一份综合报告结束，报告包括执行摘要、有证据支持的发现和可信度评分。

深度研究 配置指南

要在您的智能体环境中部署深度研究框架，请确保您的搜索和检索工具已正确配置。

# 通过 CLI 安装研究技能
openclaw install deep-research

验证您的配置文件是否包含网络搜索所需的 API 密钥，并且浏览器组件已激活以处理复杂的 JavaScript 渲染站点。

深度研究 数据架构与分类体系

该技能将其发现组织成标准化的分类法，以确保各种 Openclaw Skills 研究任务的数据完整性。

name: deep-research
description: Comprehensive research framework that combines web search, content analysis, source verification, and iterative investigation to conduct in-depth research on any topic. Use when you need to perform thorough research with multiple sources, cross-validation, and structured findings.

Deep Research Framework

Overview

The Deep Research skill provides a systematic approach to conducting thorough investigations on any topic. It combines multiple tools and methodologies to gather, analyze, verify, and synthesize information.

Core Components

1. Research Planning

• Define research objectives
• Identify key questions
• Establish search criteria
• Determine validation requirements

2. Information Gathering

• Multi-source web search
• Content extraction from various formats
• Source diversity verification
• Temporal relevance assessment

3. Analysis & Synthesis

• Cross-reference multiple sources
• Identify patterns and contradictions
• Evaluate source credibility
• Organize findings systematically

4. Validation & Verification

• Fact-checking against authoritative sources
• Cross-validation of claims
• Identify potential biases
• Assess information reliability

Research Workflow

Phase 1: Initial Investigation

1. Topic Analysis

   • Clarify research scope
   • Identify key concepts and terms
   • Define specific questions to answer

2. Broad Search

   • Use web_search to identify major sources
   • Gather diverse perspectives
   • Map the landscape of available information

3. Source Prioritization

   • Rank sources by authority and relevance
   • Identify primary vs. secondary sources
   • Note publication dates and context

Phase 2: Deep Dive

1. Detailed Content Extraction

   • Use web_fetch to retrieve full articles/pages
   • Extract key information systematically
   • Maintain source attribution

2. Cross-Reference Analysis

   • Compare claims across multiple sources
   • Identify agreements and disagreements
   • Note inconsistencies for further investigation

3. Expert Sources

   • Seek academic papers, expert opinions
   • Look for peer-reviewed sources
   • Identify recognized authorities on the topic

Phase 3: Synthesis & Validation

1. Pattern Recognition

   • Identify consistent themes across sources
   • Highlight areas of disagreement
   • Note gaps in available information

2. Fact Verification

   • Cross-check claims against authoritative sources
   • Verify dates, statistics, and attributions
   • Identify potential misinformation

3. Bias Assessment

   • Evaluate source objectivity
   • Identify potential conflicts of interest
   • Consider temporal context of information

Phase 4: Report Generation

1. Structured Summary

   • Executive summary of key findings
   • Detailed findings organized by theme
   • Supporting evidence for each claim

2. Source Evaluation

   • Assessment of source credibility
   • Identification of limitations
   • Confidence levels for different claims

3. Remaining Questions

   • Areas requiring further investigation
   • Conflicting information needing resolution
   • Gaps in current knowledge

Tools Integration

Web Research

• web_search: Initial broad search to identify sources
• web_fetch: Retrieve detailed content from specific URLs
• browser: For complex sites or when web_fetch fails

Content Processing

• read: Process downloaded content or documents
• write: Create structured research notes
• edit: Refine and organize findings

Memory & Organization

• memory_get / memory_search: Reference previous research
• write: Create persistent research records
• Structured file organization for findings

Research Quality Standards

Source Diversity

• Include multiple perspectives on controversial topics
• Balance popular and academic sources
• Include international viewpoints when relevant
• Seek primary sources when possible

Temporal Relevance

• Prioritize recent information for fast-changing topics
• Consider historical context for trend analysis
• Note when information was published
• Flag potentially outdated information

Authority Assessment

• Prioritize peer-reviewed academic sources
• Consider author credentials and institutional affiliation
• Check for potential conflicts of interest
• Verify organizational reputation

Iterative Research Approach

Cycle 1: General Overview

• Broad search to understand the topic landscape
• Identify key terms, concepts, and stakeholders
• Establish initial research questions

Cycle 2: Focused Investigation

• Targeted searches based on initial findings
• Deep dive into specific aspects
• Begin synthesis of information

Cycle 3: Validation & Refinement

• Verify key claims across multiple sources
• Resolve contradictions
• Refine understanding based on evidence

Cycle 4: Synthesis & Reporting

• Combine findings into coherent narrative
• Identify remaining uncertainties
• Prepare final research report

Output Structure

Research Report Template

# [Research Topic] - Deep Research Report

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of key findings]

## Research Questions
[Specific questions investigated]

## Methodology
[Description of research approach and tools used]

## Key Findings
[Main discoveries organized by theme]

## Supporting Evidence
[Evidence supporting each finding with sources]

## Contradictions/Debates
[Areas of disagreement among sources]

## Source Credibility Assessment
[Evaluation of information sources]

## Limitations
[Identified limitations in research]

## Further Research Needed
[Questions requiring additional investigation]

Use Cases

Academic Research

• Literature reviews
• Topic exploration
• Source verification

Business Intelligence

• Market analysis
• Competitive research
• Technology trends

Fact Checking

• Claim verification
• Misinformation identification
• Source credibility assessment

Personal Learning

• Deep topic exploration
• Concept clarification
• Question resolution

Quality Assurance

• Always verify critical claims against multiple sources
• Flag information that seems unreliable
• Maintain skepticism toward sensational claims
• Prioritize authoritative sources over anonymous ones
• Document all sources for verification purposes