什么是 谈判？

谈判技能将您的 AI 智能体转变为高级交易撮合者，利用为现代自由职业和咨询经济量身定制的、经 FBI 验证的框架。该技能汲取了 Chris Voss、Gong.io 及行业领导者的研究成果，使用户能够应对涉及资金或条款的复杂对话。通过将其纳入您的 Openclaw 技能集合，您可以获得战术同理心、校准问题和价值保护策略，确保您被视为合作伙伴而非请求者。

该技能专注于协作而非对抗，旨在通过“没错”时刻达成真正的共识。它提供了处理费率异议、抵御需求蔓延以及构建复杂股权或收入分成协议的结构化方法。无论您是面对 Upwork 客户还是高额留置金合同，此工具都能提供保护您价值所需的心理优势。

下载入口:https://github.com/openclaw/skills/tree/main/skills/staybased/reef-negotiation

安装与下载

1. ClawHub CLI

从源直接安装技能的最快方式。

2. 手动安装

将技能文件夹复制到以下位置之一

优先级：工作区 > 本地 > 内置

3. 提示词安装

将此提示词复制到 OpenClaw 即可自动安装。

谈判 应用场景

• 当客户在收到提案后推诿时，捍卫您的时薪或项目费率
• 通过识别和评估额外的客户需求来管理需求蔓延
• 谈判复杂的合同条款，如付款计划、里程碑和知识产权
• 为长期合作伙伴关系构建收入分成或股权交易
• 通过“心理博弈”教练和专业定位建立定价信心

1. 智能体识别谈判背景并应用战术同理心，以了解客户的观点和约束。
2. 技能利用镜像和标签技术，揭示客户的真实异议并化解负面情绪。
3. 智能体通过准确总结客户的情况触发“没错”的回应，使客户感到被完全理解。
4. 在讨论价格时，该技能应用 Ackerman 模型，利用战略性的非整数向目标价格移动。
5. 智能体为费率防御或需求保护提供特定的脚本和框架，并将所有策略文档输出到 artifacts 目录。

谈判 配置指南

要将此功能添加到您的智能体中，请确保技能文件存在于您的工作区中。您可以使用以下命令初始化谈判环境：

openclaw skills add negotiation

向智能体提供当前的谈判背景（如客户电子邮件或提案草案），以开始生成高价值的回应。

谈判 数据架构与分类体系

Negotiation — Close Deals and Protect Your Value

Negotiate rates, scope, and terms using Chris Voss's FBI-proven frameworks adapted for freelance and consulting deals. Sources: Chris Voss (Never Split the Difference), Gong.io, NAHC, Klenty, Aviso. All outputs go to workspace/artifacts/.

Use when

• Negotiating rates with a client (Upwork, direct, retainer)
• Client pushes back on pricing after proposal
• Scope creep discussion — client wants more without paying more
• Contract terms negotiation (payment schedules, milestones, IP)
• Equity/revenue share deals (like Alfred)
• Any conversation where money or terms are on the table

Don't use when

• Initial discovery (use client-discovery skill — negotiate AFTER you understand their needs)
• Writing the proposal itself (use proposal-writing skill)
• Handling generic objections before the money talk (use objection-handling skill)
• Internal team disagreements (different dynamic entirely)

Negative examples

• "Help me find clients" → No. This is for deal-closing, not lead gen.
• "Write my Upwork proposal" → No. Use proposal-writing skill.
• "A client is unhappy with the work" → No. That's service recovery, not negotiation.

Edge cases

• Upwork client asks for lower rate → YES. Price defense framework applies.
• Client wants to add scope without budget increase → YES. Scope protection.
• Revenue share structure (Alfred) → YES. Partnership term negotiation.
• Negotiating with yourself (pricing confidence) → Borderline but useful — the inner game section helps.

Chris Voss's Core Principles

1. Tactical Empathy

Understand their perspective BEFORE pushing yours. Not fake empathy — genuine curiosity about their constraints.

In practice:

• "It sounds like budget is tight this quarter." (labeling)
• "How can we structure this so it works for both of us?" (calibrated question)
• "What would make you feel confident moving forward?" (their terms, not yours)

2. Go for "No"

Stop chasing "yes." People feel trapped by yes. When they say "no," they feel safe and in control — then they'll actually listen.

In practice:

• Instead of "Would you like to move forward?" → "Would it be a terrible idea to start with a pilot?"
• Instead of "Can we agree on $500?" → "Is $500 unreasonable for this scope?"
• After their "no": "What would you need to change to make this work?"

3. Get to "That's Right"

"That's right" = genuine alignment. "You're right" = they're dismissing you. Know the difference.

How to trigger it: Summarize their situation so accurately they say "that's right": "So if I understand correctly — you need this done by March, your budget is around $300, and your main concern is that the last developer left the project half-done. That's a lot of risk to take on again."

When they say "that's right," you own the conversation.

4. Mirroring

Repeat the last 1-3 words they said. It feels like magic — they'll elaborate, reveal more information, and feel heard.

Example:

• Client: "We've been burned before by freelancers who disappear."
• You: "...who disappear?"
• Client: "Yeah, our last developer took the deposit and stopped responding after week 2."
• Now you know the REAL objection and can address it directly.

5. Labeling

Name their emotion or concern out loud. "It seems like..." / "It sounds like..." / "It feels like..."

Example:

• "It seems like you're worried about committing to a monthly retainer."
• "It sounds like the previous experience made you cautious about paying upfront."

Labeling defuses negative emotions and amplifies positive ones.

The Ackerman Model (Price Negotiation)

When you MUST negotiate on price (not ideal — hold value first):

1. Set your target price
2. First offer: 65% of your target (if they're offering first, let them anchor)
3. Second offer: 85% of target
4. Third offer: 95% of target
5. Final offer: 100% of target + throw in a non-monetary perk

Example (your target: $500):

• They say: "Can you do it for $300?"
• You: "Based on the scope, I'd normally be at $700 for this. (anchor high) I could do $425 if we trim [specific thing]."
• They push back: "Still high."
• You: "$475, and I'll include documentation + 1 week of support."
• Final: "$500 flat, includes everything, and I'll start today."

The non-round number trick: $487 feels more calculated and credible than $500. Use precise numbers in final offers.

Rate Defense Framework

When a client says "your rate is too high":

Step 1: Don't React

Silence is power. Pause for 3 seconds. Let the discomfort sit. Most people fill silence with concessions — don't be that person.

Step 2: Acknowledge

"I appreciate you being upfront about that." (builds trust)

Step 3: Reframe Value

"Let me walk you through what this investment delivers: [specific outcomes from discovery]. For context, agencies charge $150-200/hr for this. My rate reflects [your specific edge]."

Step 4: Offer Structure, Not Discount

• "Would it help to split into milestones? Pay $250 now, $250 on completion."
• "We could reduce scope to fit $X — I'd remove [specific item]. Which matters most to you?"
• "I can offer a 10% discount on a 3-month retainer." (trades discount for commitment)

Step 5: Walk Away (If Needed)

"I want to make sure you get the right fit. If $X doesn't work for your budget, I totally understand. Would you like me to recommend someone in a different price range?"

Walking away with grace often brings them back at your price.

Scope Creep Defense

When "just one more thing" keeps happening:

Prevention (in proposal):

• Explicit "What's NOT included" section
• "Additional requests billed at $X/hr or scoped separately"
• Milestone-based payments tied to specific deliverables

In the moment:

1. Acknowledge: "Great idea — I can see why that'd be valuable."
2. Scope it: "That would take approximately X hours to add."
3. Option: "Want me to include it in a Phase 2 scope, or add it to this project at $Y?"
4. Never: Just absorb it silently. Every "free" addition trains them to expect more.

Revenue Share / Equity Negotiation

For deals like Alfred (equity/rev share):

Protect yourself:

• Define exactly what "revenue" means (gross? net? after expenses?)
• Set a minimum monthly guarantee if possible
• Time-box the agreement (12 months, then renegotiate)
• Define what happens if the client stops using the service
• Get it in writing — even a simple email agreement

Fair structures:

• 10-20% of revenue generated by your automation (directly attributable)
• $0 upfront + rev share (higher risk for you = higher % justified)
• Monthly retainer + smaller rev share (balanced risk)

The Inner Game

The biggest negotiation is with yourself:

• Don't apologize for your price. "My rate is $49/hr" not "My rate is, um, $49... if that works?"
• Silence is your weapon. State your price and stop talking. The first person to speak after the number loses.
• You're a peer, not a supplicant. Discovery-first selling positions you as an expert diagnosing their problem, not an applicant hoping for work.
• Walk-away power is real. If you're willing to lose the deal, you negotiate from strength. If you're desperate, they smell it.
• Raise your rate. If you're winning 100% of proposals, you're too cheap. Aim for 30-50% win rate — that means your price is in the right zone.

Key Principles

• Negotiation is not combat — it's collaborative problem-solving
• Tactical empathy > aggressive tactics (every time)
• "No" is the start of negotiation, not the end
• Never split the difference — find creative solutions instead of meeting in the middle
• Non-round numbers ($487 vs $500) signal precision and credibility
• If you win 100% of negotiations, you're leaving money on the table